blinfabian@feddit.nl to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoW Celsiusfeddit.nlimagemessage-square301linkfedilinkarrow-up1746arrow-down152
arrow-up1694arrow-down1imageW Celsiusfeddit.nlblinfabian@feddit.nl to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square301linkfedilink
minus-squareSteve2734@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoEasier to understand FOR YOU. There is a reason only 3 countries is the whole world use the imperial system of measurement.
minus-squareSystemDisc@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoWhat is easier than “over 100 dangerous; under 0 dangerous”?
minus-squareSystemDisc@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoThat goes in line with what I was saying. F makes sense for weather, and not much else. C makes sense for states of water, and not much else.
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 hours agoF is just random and some people are used to it, and then try to assign meaning to the random points. Why should the temperature of a horse have any relation with the weather?
minus-squareSystemDisc@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoIt doesn’t, but it just at happens that those two arbitrary temperatures are very good lower and upper bounds for safe weather.
Easier to understand FOR YOU.
There is a reason only 3 countries is the whole world use the imperial system of measurement.
What is easier than “over 100 dangerous; under 0 dangerous”?
Below 0 ice, above 0 no ice
That goes in line with what I was saying. F makes sense for weather, and not much else. C makes sense for states of water, and not much else.
F is just random and some people are used to it, and then try to assign meaning to the random points. Why should the temperature of a horse have any relation with the weather?
It doesn’t, but it just at happens that those two arbitrary temperatures are very good lower and upper bounds for safe weather.