• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    “The botnet was taken offline by the provider because it was used for criminal purposes.”

    Isn’t the botnet itself a criminal intrusion? I mean, it’s unlikely that the owners of the exit nodes were even aware they were part of it.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      It sounds like people installed one of those free proxy things that’s actually malware. I’m not sure I’d call that “intrusion” but it’s certainly illegal.

      • kn33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, it might’ve not been illegal. It was probably hidden in some T&C somewhere. That’s the trade-off. You get a free privacy proxy, they get a free residential proxy endpoint.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Deploying botnet software is usually always illegal, regardless of consent.