• Anivia@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure how your example is “not even enough”? If the charger is labeled as only having a 5v/1A and a 20V/6A profile, then where is the problem?

    • hikaru755@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The problem is that the average consumer will have no idea what those numbers mean. If it was as simple as “this charger can output up to X watt”, labeling would probably be fine, but as soon as it gets more complicated than that, you’re beyond what most of the population is able and/or willing to deal with

      • toofpic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, I’m all for universally easy things and a consumer not being stressed, but if we really got to the “I don’t get basic numbers” territory, then go learn some school physics, and maybe that Volts is the pressure in the pipe, Amps is how fast the water flows through it, and Watts is just pressure times flow rate - it’s that simple. Go and fucking learn what is what, there’s enough information in my comment alone.

        • hikaru755@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Maybe that’s a hot take, but I am of the opinion that you shouldn’t need to understand physics for the most basic usage of the device that manages your entire life

      • GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep! In this case, you may go “Oh, 120W is more than my phone’s 20W charging speed, so it’ll be fine,” only to find out that because it’s only available at a voltage higher than the phone supports it’ll be a very slow charger. I don’t think most consumers want or care to look at what charging profiles their phones and chargers support.