No, the article says their problems are with surveillance and automated weapons…
Which are valid concerns for almost everyone…
Which is why everyone should have a say in it, and not just the people the AI companies choose to employ.
If their employees get to decide it, they just won’t have any employees that are willing to say AI shouldn’t be used for that. Employment would be predicated on saying AI should have no limits.
Which is why if this happened, it would overall be a bad thing.
No, the article says their problems are with surveillance and automated weapons…
No. Those are things that affect them. Find something these fuckers won’t do to others that doesn’t also affect them before contradicting my statement.
No, the article says their problems are with surveillance and automated weapons…
Which are valid concerns for almost everyone…
Which is why everyone should have a say in it, and not just the people the AI companies choose to employ.
If their employees get to decide it, they just won’t have any employees that are willing to say AI shouldn’t be used for that. Employment would be predicated on saying AI should have no limits.
Which is why if this happened, it would overall be a bad thing.
they might be “afraid” but are still doing it anyway, and collecting a paycheck periodically
No. Those are things that affect them. Find something these fuckers won’t do to others that doesn’t also affect them before contradicting my statement.
I’m sorry I couldn’t explain it in a way you can understand