• badgermurphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Those are called “trial balloons”. They announce a feature they know will be wildly unpopular to gauge the severity of the backlash, then temporarily reverse course while running a massive public outreach campaign to draw as much attention as possible to their feel-good response to the public: “we hear you and respect your opinions”, etc.

    Then, when the buzz dies down, they re-implement those same things slowly and quietly. In some of your examples, their responses are literally nothing more than words in print; no actual actions have been taken that align with their announcements.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Unity somewhat fits that description, but it was definitely net negative for their business, and with how long it took them to walk back from it, I don’t think they had any plans to walk back before the backlash. Microsoft has been slowly making Windows worse for a long, long time; it wasn’t something they did all at once and then issued a “we hear you”. They are legitimately scared of losing their market dominance right now.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’ll reserve judgment on Microsoft’s motives until I see them take even a single action, not statement, in a positive direction. Right now, they seem to just be putting a fake moustache on Copilot, calling it something else, and then claiming they’re rolling back frivolous Copilot integrations.