• BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Which “British research firm” labels them a loophole?

    The paper is from the European Parliament Research Service, which is an in-house EU Parliament service. And the “briefing” they published has a section titled “A loop hole that needs closing” that starts “Some argue that this is a loophole in the legislation that needs closing and call for age verification to be required for VPNs as well”. The words “Some argue” are a hyperlink to a South African news article / opinion piece by some random journalist who writes in a slightly snarky way about VPNs allowing people to bypass the Online Safety Act.

    So the TomsHardware article is nonsense - it’s an EU briefing paper which seems to think a random south african opinion piece counts as “research”. No British research firm, and in fact no real research at all - just crap layerd on crap and making it’s way into a crap briefing paper. If this is the quality of the information been given to MEPs, EU citizens should be worried.

    Links:

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Tom’s Hardware should be banned for their trash-tier status. Not only poor journalism, but hostility to users through things like hijacking your back button.

    • in_the_dark_forest@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This is what I love about the fedverse. People directly calling out such crappy articles that just spread misleading information for the sake of whatever.