Everyone has a unique writing style, word choice, sentence structure, punctuation habits and that can be used to identify them. Lingunymous rewrites your text using a local LLM to mask these patterns, making it harder to attribute writing to a specific individual.
Use cases include:
- Protecting anonymity when publishing sensitive or controversial content
- Evading authorship attribution and stylometric analysis
- Separating your personal writing fingerprint from pseudonymous accounts
To my knowledge, for TOML spec, strict validating against a schema is not a thing. So it’s not used with very likely dangerous user input.
So the spec could be 100,000 years old, for obvious security vulnerability reasons, would still not touch it.
Recommend taking a read through the strictyaml authors documentation on shortcomings of various user supplied input file formats.
You are in for a treat:
Why
Why not
specifically Why not TOML