• CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    NUCs and other mini PCs are better (for the most part) anyway. Many have msata or nvme support, replaceable and expandable memory, better cooling, more powerful CPUs, and some have the ability to add in PCIe cards. Some even allow for CPU replacement/upgrades.

    For lower power stuff, esp32s are where it’s at.

    I’m not sure what the usefulness of using a raspberry pi is, anymore. If you have something that you don’t want to suck power, ESP32s have you covered and will always use less power than a rpi. If you need a bit more performance, a mini PC will almost always outperform a rpi.

    • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are plenty of other chipsets that are lower in power consumption than ESP32. Raspberry Pi does provide the Pico 1 and Pico 2 for embedded stuff which is mostly great. Don’t know if they fixed the errata 9 on the Pico 2 yet with the leaking GPIO thingy.

      STM32, AVR based stuff, PIC, ESP32, Pico’s. We got a lot of fun stuff to tinker with.

      • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is true, yeah. I’m referring to the “normal” rpis, though. The ones that are the most affected by the price increase. I struggle to understand the usecase for those.

        • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It is that many are familiar with them, they have good support, fairly extendible and great community.

          Also used in commercial solutions for those exact reasons.

          There is cheaper and better hardware but the RPi has a bit of a goldilocks position.