• oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Somebody kill this cunt on camera and threaten everyone profiting from it that they’re next and man it. People like him deserve to suffer just for our amusement.

    That’s the livestream I would actually tune into. Make it a double feature with Trump.

    We skip trials when literally everyone already has the evidence.

    • insanemantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Skip trials when we have all the evidence we need, before these genocidal maniacs send ICE to skip OUR trials

      Something poetic about that

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This guy is really trying to piss people off with his stupid fucking ideas and acting like he should lead humanity into his vision of the future.

    Apparently Facebook forbids saying you hope someone gets a disease, gets killed by a natural disaster, dies without a specific perpetrator or method, or gets smited by a deity or absence thereof…no joke.

    Anyway, I don’t want to step on the wrong side of our cyberlords /s so I’ll just say this:

    Fuck Sam Altman. I hope he sees that no one likes him, his ideas are dumber than AI generated slop, his parents left his stroller in the sun too long, and I hope he eats some South American beef.

    • insanemantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I use it regularly but only for free, in hopes that I contribute to the burning of their profits

      Ask it some silly nonsense shit

    • insanemantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Rich people are safe and comfortable in prison, and their influence slips through the bars

      I prefer putting him in a certain prison…

      The prison that he had been in before he was born

    • DillDough@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Why should we continue allowing him to drain us like the parasite he is? He’s okay with ending our species if he’s able to generate the most capital and control of any organization in history, why is it so unacceptable that we simply end him instead?

  • bender223@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    20 hours ago

    why do these so called captains of industry always sound like whiny little bitches? if they’re so smart, come up with a better solution

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    23 hours ago

    So we’d own a basic terminal, and pay a subscription for our computing needs.

    Gosh, who’d’a thunkit? Never saw that one coming.

    • MrShankles@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Especially not when he said how he envisions ai to someday be a utility like water or electricity, that everyone will pay for

      Shocked, I tell you. I’m utterly shocked

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        He can pry my local AI out of my cold dead hands. My gpu is capable of running it and damnit i will run it locally

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So we’d own a basic terminal, and pay a subscription for our computing needs.

      No.

      We would rent a proprietary terminal that also needs a paid subscription to a computing service.

    • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “In this supply-constrained environment, efficiency of centralized control only makes sense!”

      “For whom? Also, why is the supply constrained in the first place?”

      “Well, we used hype from central bank-level investors to lend us enough to buy up all the supply. We have sooo much debt that we need every penny of efficiency we can get.”

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        “In this supply-constrained environment, efficiency of centralized control only makes sense!”

        “For whom?

        Makes (financial) sense for the central controller’s business model to succeed.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Sam Altman has lost the plot.

    His own model of LLM isn’t sustainable or profitable, where the local software model us.

    And the economy isn’t there just to make Sam Altman richer.

    This is (another) Let them eat cake moment in which another spoiled aristocrat has lost touch with the common people.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The problem isn’t the AI, the issue is that the elites are trying to horde it and keep it from us little people. If we are to have agency, having personal ownership over local AI, collectively owned AI, and regulations, are all key to ensuring that democracy and egalitarianism is secure.

    The elite will not willingly surrender power, especially there is a void that they can colonize. Ordinary people like us should fill the vacuum, to deny the elite from having total control over AI.

    • insanemantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I agree. Although I come from a relatively anti AI stance, I still feel obligated to protect our rights to use it freely

    • NovaVeles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      One of the reasonable things with “free” markets is that manufactures are just going to keep making RAM, year after year. So these AI data centers have to keep purchasing the bulk of new RAM in perpetuity til the end of time OR eventually the dam will break and they lose control. I put my bet on the second option.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Elites keeping things to themselves, tale as old as time. That’s why they makes the lllms computationally expensive (requiring huge data centers mean but really that’s just their level now). But someone will figure out a better algorithm that we’ll be able to do on our phone one day. Then next generation comes out.

      So the issue isn’t technology but the elites eh? All commie talk I know, can’t wait for that kid in diapers now end up with the best way to make them learn with minimal requirements. Course by then the next thing will be taking off. Oh well. When you make under 100k and they can throw billions at an issue it’s nearly impossible…but I can’t wait for someone to open source something to make it all worthless for monetary gains while the elite are holding onto it hard. Maybe it’ll happen maybe not oh well.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Its not AI per se.…its knowledge. And yes i know “art” but that’s subjective

  • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I don’t think he deserves the money he is hoarding, which is a bit worse.

    If we wish to right things we should take his money then we can figure out how to get him some additional tech.

  • luna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I just read an article yesterday about a young woman who passed away after following the advice of an AI to stop taking her medication. I simply don’t understand why these capitalists are always so intent on monopolizing the market and controlling people. Are they truly so foolish that they always assume they’re right about everything—as if they were omnipotent?

    • OriginalTangle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I think if you made it to billionaire you probably think you have things figured out better than most people.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I simply don’t understand why these capitalists are always so intent on monopolizing the market and controlling people.

      Power and money. They’re real life super villains. It’s why most people run for politics or become cops. Some want to make the world better, most just want to control others because they’ve lacked any kind of control at home or through their lives.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yes, they assume because they have money they are doing everything right and must be the smartest people around. Even average people equate money with intelligence for some reason. It’s insane because the majority of people with lots of money inherited it. It’s almost impossible to become rich using just intelligence and hard work though. You always have to exploit people and be unethical in some way

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The woman explicitly ignored her doctors though. It’s unfortunate and I think that model was flawed but it’s still a brain dead thing to do. At some point the benefits of helping millions outweigh some rare decisions and I’m not a corporate AI shill, an open source model would be just as susceptible to this scenario.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Yeah with open models catching up and giving reasonable results in consumer grade setups, they are gonna go full on with “unregulated AI is too dangerous we should only allow hardware gated LLMs”.

    It is so funny this guy is the CEO of a company called openAI lol.