• ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    No because that’s your argument, to disprove that it outputs more than pablum you literally just have to use it

    I mean the explosion in its use for coding alone kills your argument

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Are you kidding me? Have you seen the state of software? Have you installed the vibe-coded Windows patches? Looked at the horrific slop overflowing on GitHub?

      LLMs are fast as coding assistants. Fast doesn’t mean good. The drop in quality over the last year or so has been nothing short of shocking. And I’ve had multiple vibe-coders tell me my mistake is looking at the code, which they no longer do.

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        And I’ve had multiple vibe-coders tell me my mistake is looking at the code, which they no longer do.

        ok well thanks for confirming you were wrong?

        Your opinion on what you think LLM’s code quality has no impact on its use, and as you pointed out, it is being used for coding whether you like it or not