From the river to the sea is not antisemitic. In the Palestine before 1947 Jews, Christians and Muslims all lived side by side as neighbors, and none of them had spwcial rights or was threatened.
What that sentence does mean though, is that there would be no jewish apartheid ethnostate that is actively stealing land left and right, and starting wars with people they see as inferior.
Oh I know, that’s just the card he’s trying to play (the same card Israel uses regularly, ‘any support of Palestine = antisemitism’, ‘any criticism of Israel = antisemitism’).
From the river to the sea is not antisemitic. In the Palestine before 1947 Jews, Christians and Muslims all lived side by side as neighbors, and none of them had spwcial rights or was threatened.
What that sentence does mean though, is that there would be no jewish apartheid ethnostate that is actively stealing land left and right, and starting wars with people they see as inferior.
Oh I know, that’s just the card he’s trying to play (the same card Israel uses regularly, ‘any support of Palestine = antisemitism’, ‘any criticism of Israel = antisemitism’).
Appreciate your comment though.
Ah, I misunderstood your comment then, it’s true that Israelis try to play that card (quite successfully so).
I’d recommend putting the fake “antisemitism” (because not all anti Zionism is antisemitic) in quotes, to make it more clear.