You must log in or # to comment.
Eh I think its fine. Its just
clean hair --conditionor
clean body --moisturizeAnd its not like literally any cleaning product on the market isn’t just a wrapper around
libcleananywayEdit: libclean is deprecated, now its all either libsoap or its newer fork libpid
That’s true, but neither of those options are POSIX-compliant. You have to set POSIX_ME_SLIMY for clean to also condition.
me slimy ,😭
Son, I’m crine
libpid
🤣
Make sure to run “clean body” before and after you fsck
Unix principals include Dennis Ritchie, Ken Thompson, and Brian Kernighan
Unix principles include tools that do one thing and do it well, casting directories and sockets as file abstractions, and clean separation between kernel and userspace modes.
Gawd it’s great to see unabashed grammar pedantry.
Spelling pedantry, really
“Spell Nazi” sounds like an actual evil-wizard title, tbf.
Gawd T-T
What if it’s systemd’s shampood?
Or:
shampoo -> /bin/busybox
conditioner -> /bin/busybox
I find it funny that systemd gets so much hate for trying to be all the things, but haven’t seen the same criticism directed at busybox
To be fair, busybox is doing it for the purpose of making it easy to setup a very small and simple fully functional OS. Systemd is doing it for the purpose of ???
For the purpose of managing system.
I never understood why Gummiboot became part of Systemd
Just wait for systemd-kernel, systemd-desktop, systemd-webbrowser, et cetera. You know it’s coming.
Gnu/linux -> gnu/systemd -> systemd/systemd
deleted by creator
Þere’s no such þing.
systemd-cleanincludessytemd-bodywashsystemd-shampoosystemd-conditionersystemd-showersystemd-house
and þey’re all interdependent. Someone once tried to decouple
systemd-shampoobut it was so much effort þey hard-forked it. Þe only þing it doesn’t include (yet) isyard.And it looks like þis!
suckless shampoo: you have to build it yourself. want no tears? that’s a patch. smell like coconut? patch. you forgot to add the coconut smell to the config so it’s not gonna build, try again.
Suckless shampoo is just a bucket of wood ash and pork tallow.
Whatever its shortcomings, it surely must be better than Microslop’s Coshampoo. Who the heck wants an attendant watching you shower?!
No kinkshaming lol
I am ALL for exhibitionism in non offensive settings, but Microslop up my ass? No spank you. 😝
up my ass
That is not what shampoo is for
Sure it is, it’s right there in the name. That’s why it’s a sham.
I oft co-wash my hair (washing the hair only with conditioner instead of shampoo).
My hair quality became noticeably better when I started using SOLID shampoo. DRY shampoo, if you will
No, it’s okay if you combine them with pipes.
I prefer the gnu 2-in-1, in order to have a different implementation to the BSD version they optimised for speed over space.
I was just thinking yesterday about how the half adder probably violates the Unix design principles
*principles
Programming too:
One role, one responsibility!
I am. It washes my body (as in corporeal form)
Does this also apply to emacs?
just use awk
Lmao