• floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    You seem really intentioned on antagonising me for being someone that is not being contrarian. What is your last sentence even supposed to mean? “Cannot understand that people are here because they did not like Reddit”, really?

    You are having a redditor moment by falling into shallow campism and name-calling instead of discussing a point critically.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It was in response to being called intentionally obtuse and “part of the problem” after pointing out that you were attacking me without making logical sense. Contrarian was a poor choice of words I admit, maybe hostile would’ve been more appropriate.

          • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            “called out” implies that I did something wrong. I was expressing an opinion and you called me obtuse without arguing why, then went to make that “if you cannot understand that people are here because they did not like Reddit then you are part of the problem” statement which I ironically find quite obtuse - I don’t think you honestly believed I don’t know/understand that users here don’t want it to be Reddit. Or what “problem” exactly I’m supposed to be a part of.

            You just decided to see an enemy in me for some reason, and that’s what I meant for contrarian/hostile.

            • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              If you are going to ignore my problem with you then that’s on you. But I very much didn’t “decide to see an enemy”. You are clearly taking this way to seriously.

              • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I am not ignoring it, you are not explaining what exactly this problem is. I guess just disagreeing? Or did you really believe my comment was obtuse and that I’m either unintelligent or arguing in bad faith? Btw you’re right, we’re starting to get a bit too deep in the comments, but I do love the irony of someone complaining about reddit and then bringing here the same bad discussions and behaviours.

                • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  If the sentence “Lemmy does not need to be a copy of Reddit” is to complicated for you then I am done trying to explain.

                  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    Ah, ok, I’m too stupid to understand something I’ve agreed with all along, gotcha. Great argumentation, doesn’t show that you’re completely missing the point in order to insult me again at all.

                    I think I am also entirely done trying to have a constructive discussion with you as all I got in response was insults and attacks.