Almost like they have something to hide.
If this is a ploy by meta to get me to root for their shitty surveillance glasses, it’s not going to work…
Buy the Alibaba version, problem solved!
If they had a Linux driver or there were other glasses that were free…
… then the chuds wouldn’t have to tape the LEDs, but the privacy implications would be unchanged.
No headline will get me to hate these abominations less.
the worst are the chuds who scream ‘you have no expectation of privacy!’ or ‘they’re no different than a smart phone’ jfc… as if there aren’t laws against voyeurism and harassment… and of course the first thing the chuds did was disable the recording lights. and meta keeps putting face ID shit into the APIs but swearing it’s not being used. like anyone would trust meta when it comes to privacy.
fucks sake it’s all so fucking gross.
Oh no, the government surveillance fascists and the corporate surveillance fascists are fighting.
That’s a strong argument for Meta glasses…
Meaning meta has an incentive to popularize this perspective…
This is so ironic. “We want Traffic Cameras so we can monitor what everyone does, but we don’t everyone to see what we do.”
If they ban PervGlasses, they will also need to ban all the different variants of PervCameras.
Nah. They won’t ban pervglasses. They will regulate so that Meta has to delete local files when they record police, but keep the online version available to police requests only.
There’s earbuds now too
“Remember that unless you do something bad, you have nothing to fear from surveillance.”
That is what has been claimed by the authorities for decades, so clearly they are worried about nothing.
Ah yes, recording is OK only for them, not for you. Got it.
Nice try, meta
Everyone does…
Go flock yourselves.
Good