• limonfiesta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    236
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Web services and websites should block all Utah IP addresses and redirect to page explaining that because they cannot tell who’s using a VPN, their only option is to block all of Utah.

    Yes, I understand how dumb that is, but sometimes you have to fight stupid with stupider.

      • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Many VPN providers regularly rotate their IP ranges.

        Regardless, that wouldn’t reveal to a website where the traffic was originating from.

        • baronvonj@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          wouldn’t reveal to a website where the traffic is coming from

          that’s… exactly the point here. If you’re connecting thru a VPN then the web site is supposed to ID you because you might be circumventing their local ID laws.

          • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 minutes ago

            I was replying specifically to your comment…

            “It’s actually quite trivial to detect most VPN providers. There’s publicly available IP lists…”

            None of that has anything with what I’m suggesting, or why I suggested it.

            I’ve explained the rationale in other comments, but this is an action of protest, not a technical response or workaround to the law.

            If Utah passed the stupid law, you have to inconvenience Utah voters, and to do that, websites should block all Utah IP addresses. Making clear to their users that due to the new regulatory framework, they’re no longer doing business in Utah.

            If that upsets people in Utah, they can reach out to their representatives to ask why they voted to ruin the internet in Utah.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Even worse, that would not necessarily help. If someone’s accessing your website through a VPN that’s not located in that state, you would not block it… then become liable.

      Better block everything at this point -_-

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The great firewall of Utah, all your pron must be inspected by government officials prior to delivery…

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That just means that people in Utah would need to use a VPN to access those sites.

      Which is hilarious, and a predictable result when your legislature is mostly filled with people who could’ve retired decades ago…

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Web services and websites should block all Utah IP addresses and redirect to page explaining that because they cannot tell who’s using a VPN, their only option is to block all of Utah.

      But VPN users using a VPN outside of Utah will still get through.

      What Utah (and likely other dumb states soon) are trying to do is to force age verification worldwide through a state law, forcing websites to verify the age of every user from anywhere, because any user who accesses the site from anywhere in the world might possibly be someone in Utah using a VPN.

      • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I understand.

        Which is why I’m suggesting they preemptively block everyone in Utah. Protesting needs to inconvenience people and good protests redirect that anger towards those in power.

        “Utah’s new law us makes us legally liable for providing our services to residence in Utah using a VPN. As that is not technically possible, we have no choice but to cease operating in Utah, or allowing Utah residents to use our services.”

        But whether or not that particular strategy would be an effective from a protest, is a moot point, as big tech is behind these types of age verification and use identification laws, and those are the only websites and services with a large enough user base to make a difference here.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Which is why I’m suggesting they preemptively block everyone in Utah.

          Pornhub and other porn sites already do this.

          They would still be liable for transmitting content to a Utah resident using a VPN to appear as though they were in neighboring Arizona.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Web services and websites should block all Utah IP addresses

      That won’t work on a VPN, though. The VPN will say the user is coming from outside the state. That’s the whole point of the VPN.

    • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No, the better solution is for sites that age verification is pointless to block Utah. If you make a mobil app check the GPS or IP and disabl the app if they are in Utah. People should go on sites like Yelp in mass and put down votes on every establishment in Utah so that ths site becomes useless for anyone in Utah. Pretty much just destroy all tech and internet for all things Utah.

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yes, I understand how dumb that is

      i don’t think you do. residents of utah don’t have to use vpn with endpoint in utah, so in order for your “gotcha” to work, they would have to block whole world. since most people will choose endpoint far from them, it would probably be enough to block anything but utah…

      • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s the point…

        It would be protest against Utah’s dumb law, with an even dumber response, that’s designed specifically to inconvenience people in Utah…

        • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          8 hours ago

          so you would bully the people being bullied by this law to protest the law that bullies them? well that would show them!

          • slaacaa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            “The people being bullied” lol, they are called voters and they voted for the government that does this. Americans can fuck right off with their victim mentality. Go fix your shithole country instead

            • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              omg, i have hit some loser vein with this comment 😂

              yeah, the people are voters, some of them voted for someone, some voted for someone else, and trying to bully people you claim to be protecting still makes you pathetic loser.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Unless you are willing to admit that Utah is a dictatorship, then yes “bullying” the people is very appropriate.

            This is an issue with american thinking, the sanctity of normality. You think doing anything that effects the every person is somehow off limits, you think the daily life of the people is unassailable. Its the same nonsense over and over across everything and I think why americans always talk about how “nothing can be done” about any issue that comes up. The us of a is flying off a cliff in multiple ways but americans will put up with it as long as they don’t notice a change in their daily life.

            It is why you are all ok with war, right up until the gas price goes up.

            It is why you are all ok with losing liberties, right up until it effects you personally.

            It is why you are all ok with your media and entertainment pushing usa #1 bullshit that always ends up “back to normal”, right up until you can’t ignore reality.

            It is why you are all ok with a clearly broken and non democratic system, right up until nether party is able to guarantee your lifestyle.

            It is why you are all ok with draconian “purity” laws being put into place, right up until sites you like to use realize that Utah is not worth the work to be there.

            • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              hey doc, here is one who forgot to take their pills!

              This is an issue with american thinking

              You think doing

              it is why you are all ok with

              it is why you are all ok with

              it is why you are all ok with

              it is why you are all ok with

              it is why you are all ok with

              you do know there are people in the world that are not americans, right?

              “bullying” the people is very appropriate.

              no, it is not. once you are done with this tantrum, i suggest to talk to a mental health professional and ask them for explanation.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                no, it is not. once you are done with this tantrum, i suggest to talk to a mental health professional and ask them for explanation.

                Yes, it is. You americans will get to see the results of your madness first hand over the next few years, there is no “tantrum” over it, just the explanation of the consequences you are all facing from thinking you are special.

          • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I think you’re confused on the concept of protesting.

            Or maybe you’re just a fan of this law, or don’t think it’s a big deal.

            Either way, I disagree.