• TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    AMD is more stable in games where Proton/Native Linux builds have weird issues, sometimes leading to a 9070xt leading a 5080 (even beating a 5090 in like starfield but like, lol.) Raytracing still heavily prefers Nvidia.

    Does not directly compare to windows benchmarks. Low V-ram causes failures. Some native versions for linux are actively worse than running windows through Proton Loading Shaders before launching game can take long (longer on Nvidia cards), and can be required very often.

    Suggest watching the last 10m where they talk about these issues if you don’t have time for the whole video.

  • LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m so happy to see some big channels doing these Linux tests. I know it’s probably way more difficult since there are thousands of distros to try!

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t need to test every distro.

      Honestly you could capture 90 percent of the market with just arch and Debian/Ubuntu.

      You could add 2 or 3 of the gaming focused distros for comparison however since they tend to be built on top of the two above things are more likely going to vary based on configuration more than which distro or de you are using.

      • 3laws@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lets be real, Ubuntu/Arch is the way to go. Debian is just not present on gaming set ups, Arch is close to what Valve is doing and Ubuntu has like 69 downstream distros.

        • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Before I say anything, I think Gamer’s Nexus only testing with Bazzite makes a ton of sense. It would be silly to expect them to test with Windows S, N, Pro, LTSC, etc as well.

          Lets be real, Ubuntu/Arch is the way to go.

          The distinction between Ubuntu, Mint, and Debian are pretty minor as far as gaming goes. They are all considered the same family for a reason.

          Debian is just not present on gaming set ups

          Linux Mint (a Debian-based distro) and Ubuntu (also Debian-based) are extremely popular in gaming setups. In fact, the steam hardware survey has Mint 22.2, Ubuntu Core 22, Ubuntu 24, and Mint 22.1 as the second, third, fourth, and fifth most common Linux OSes.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            While true, the issue is that Debian release cadence is such that they will always be “behind” kernel and wine wise.

            Also they are more purist and less likely to facilitate proprietary bits. Last time I tried wine a lot of apps didn’t work because they had no work to enable non-free fints So they may have the same general packaging strategy, but the vintage of content and scope are distinctly different from more aggressive distributions.

  • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I really like that now some Content Creators are working on providing useful information for Linux gamers. Especially information like bad Frame pacing or “unreasonable” bad performance for some certain games for certain hardware is a very important information to make a good decision when buying a card.

    Me personally I am not very interested in the performance comparison between Linux and Windows. I choose Linux as my daily driver for specific reasons, and game performance was not a high priority. But knowing which Hardware might have strange performance problems compared to other Hardware if I wamt to game is always a very nice thing.

    I liked that the Intel B580 was included in the charts. This gave me some usefull information for comparing it to a AMD 9060 XT. Only thing I am missing is if it is the 8GB or 16GB version of the Sapphire Pulse. But I did not check their Blog/Site post yet.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      100% this. I’ve been on Linux longer than Steam has, and I’m not changing anytime soon. I’m probably also not going to buy Nvidia (I value FOSS drivers), but maybe I will if the performance gap is significant enough.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If nividia just dropped a driver the quality of their windows one randomly one day. I would expect like 70%+ of the Linux community would suddenly be buying a Nvidia card no questions asked.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Enabling anticheat means the user must sacrifice many of their core freedoms just to play a video game. And in principle anticheat will never fully prevent cheating short of pointing a camera at the user and watch them the whole time they are playing.

      I hope Linux community can push back. This whole thing is idiotic and harms the consumers.

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Enabling anticheat means the user must sacrifice many of their core freedoms just to play a video game.

        Lots of games support anti-cheat in Linux. It’s critical to note that anti-cheat in general is not the issue.

        Kernel-level anti-cheat however is. It’s a massive security issue and something that everyone, including Windows users, should roundly reject.