• ExistentialNightmare@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    ‘Humans are naturally greedy and instead of doing anything to try right this wrong, we should just be contempt being awful. Oh, and also ignore all historical evidence of the ways tribes would share resources communally.’

  • Rindogang@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah… people forget that ancient humans survived through cooperation long before states existed and the fights they did have were mostly just over territory and resources. Not some deep evil ‘‘human nature’’

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There was cooperation, sure. There was also a lot of killing.

      It’s not just human nature, even chimps kill chimps from other groups who stray into the wrong territory.

    • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would make the argument that our species resorting to violent conflict over shareable resources is a pretty damning indictment of human nature.

      Tribalism exists, it’s a scientific fact. You can overcome the biases it imposes through cognitive effort, but at a baseline we are predisposed to hate anyone who we believe “doesn’t belong.” That’s not inherently evil, but it is asshole behavior.

    • Dialectical Idealist@lemmygrad.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you only saw a bear in a circus, you would think its nature was to ride a unicycle.

      It’s also intellectually dishonest to ignore examples of communal behavior, such as gift economies and communal farrming, as somehow not counting when we’re considering “human nature”. There are exceedingly many examples of selflessness even in this individualist hellhole we built for ourselves.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not quite, if that were the case the statement would be “because assholes”. By blaming “human nature” they’re self identifying as one of the assholes.

      Assholism is a diverse group with many discrete types of sub-asshole.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s the nature of humanity that in any reasonably sized group, there are always a few assholes.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I don’t think so. Good things can’t happen because of human nature: making good things happen involves groups making decisions, and in every group there are bound to be some assholes because that’s human nature, that limits the kinds of good things that can happen.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        It just means they recognize that we are all assholes on the inside. Some of us cognitively try to supress the assholeness. But it’s there. If it wasn’t you would have died of hunger as a baby probably. Cause boy-oh is screaming at 2am an asshole move.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      And that they’ve observed that once groups reach a certain size, it’s inevitable that the group contains at least one asshole.

      It’s like the fable of the scorpion and the frog. It doesn’t mean that it’s impossible to cross the river. It just means that you need a more complex plan than just carrying the scorpion across on your back.

  • Oisteink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nah - if I say that to you, I’m talking about you. But not directly as you cant take criticism