Deep@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoThe New York Childrens Online Safety Act will ban anyone under 18 from chatting online.www.nysenate.govexternal-linkmessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down18cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.world
arrow-up1118arrow-down1external-linkThe New York Childrens Online Safety Act will ban anyone under 18 from chatting online.www.nysenate.govDeep@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square23linkfedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.world
minus-squarequantumcrop@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·15 hours agoSo adults don’t have to verify their age right? Cuz it’s only for kids, right?
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·15 hours agoI hid the answer to your question in the text of the comment that you replied to.
minus-squareTiefkuehlkost@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 hours agoIm pretty shure that was a sarcastic rethorical question through and we all now the answer…
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·11 hours agoAh. Well, we shouldn’t look for details about the story in the comments, or by reading the headline. Often, as is the case here, the headline is misleading or completely wrong. This is a sarcastic rhetorical response but, like, in a chill vibes kinda way.
So adults don’t have to verify their age right? Cuz it’s only for kids, right?
I hid the answer to your question in the text of the comment that you replied to.
Im pretty shure that was a sarcastic rethorical question through and we all now the answer…
Ah. Well, we shouldn’t look for details about the story in the comments, or by reading the headline.
Often, as is the case here, the headline is misleading or completely wrong.
This is a sarcastic rhetorical response but, like, in a chill vibes kinda way.