Currently it is way more cost efficient to use a human
- 0 Posts
- 16 Comments
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•Generative AI Is an Engineering Disaster. A shockingly inefficient trillion-dollar project.English11·9 days ago
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•Chat Control 1.0 passed the European Parliament — through the back doorEnglish1·13 days ago
The neat part is the system doesn’t allow it but the person that had to reject it was for this so she didnt
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•Execs Confused and Horrified by the Huge AI Bills After Thinking They Could Replace Workers for FreeEnglish29·16 days ago
Openai had 2025 6billion in revenue and 20 billion costs on compute. So just to run the models to get 6billion they need to pay 20billion r&d and marketing etc get on top of that
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•Midjourney wants Hollywood studios to reveal the details of their AI usage | TechCrunchEnglish2·18 days ago
Yes but I kinda want to also see Disney harbinger of bogus copyright law, broken creativity and fathers of patent trolling to burn
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•Cleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using ThemEnglish2·20 days ago
Put new inlays in your shoes that are half cut
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•A new, inexpensive Chinese AI model is catching up with Anthropic, OpenAI on their home turfEnglish1·22 days ago
I kinda dislike that in most benches the Chinese models are not included
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•How my AI Agent views and maintains "our" homelabEnglish31·28 days ago
Well you asked why anybody else would do it and I answered on that
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•How my AI Agent views and maintains "our" homelabEnglish21·28 days ago
I mean it is an interesting test for ai capabilities and limitations. You have an existing low tech deterministic use case and setup and can compare that with the ai setup
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•If Phones Are Killing Pedestrians, Why Is It Only Happening in America?English2·29 days ago
Well european roads are mostly narrower because they were build 600 years ago
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang says electricians and plumbers will be needed by the hundreds of thousands in the new working worldEnglish3·1 month ago
As a gamer they already lost me years ago but I urge everyone else to let them fail as a general business memorial
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•OpenAI made $13 billion in 2025 and lost $21 billion doing itEnglish1·1 month ago
That totally depends on how much it will cost. Alot of use cases ppl show me for AI code helps are mostly solved with templates that are in ides for like 20 years.
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•Low-skilled attacker used Claude, Codex to breach 14 companiesEnglish1·1 month ago
No 5% is very low compared to before AI and this still does not mean the absolute number of found bugs has risen. From my understanding it didn’t for curl. Further it is unlikely that bugs in curl are not found. Basically everything works with curl and it’s a paid bug bounty program so a lot of security researchers are looking at it
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•Low-skilled attacker used Claude, Codex to breach 14 companiesEnglish83·1 month ago
Well the problem is that for example curl got flooded with generated security reports where only 5% had some true security potential. So your llm will basically flood you with false positives
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•OpenAI made $13 billion in 2025 and lost $21 billion doing itEnglish2·1 month ago
Well what I currently don’t understand is what is the industry use case. From the numbers alone you would need to spend double the current tokens cost, which is already very high. Every industry partner I talked to said they don’t have valid use cases for ai
- DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•OpenAI made $13 billion in 2025 and lost $21 billion doing itEnglish1·1 month ago
And in R&D
Pretty much depends on the price. If it is over the counter painkiller pricing yes if it is hiv med pricing no