Which registrar, if you’re willing to disclose?
I’m using multiple, with some domains not having many options. I have yet to see this but it’s worrying.
I have dozens, but the request was only applied to one of them. I got the impression they were doing the requests incrementally to give support a chance to field all the tickets from people like myself pushing back.
With the ticket, at first a human responded, then the next response was a few pages of AI slop which didnt answer my enquiry. I politely told them that the AI generated response didnt answer my question and asked them to have a human review and respond.
Then I found a more expensive Australian registrar ventraip. They at least claimed to have 24/7 human support. I transferred the offending domain.
Onlydomains idiots replied a week later saying “uh, it looks like this domain has been transferred away, and that was the only one we had requested ID for at this time, so you dont need to do anything for now i guess.”
Btw
It would be better to prove that it is secure.
If you think about last year, for example (That applies to Qualcomm, so you’d have to check what hardware is installed. ) —CVE-2026-25262(But it’s only now making headlines)—the question remains: what hasn’t been discovered yet?
The focus is still on what has been discovered; the question remains: what has not yet been discovered?
And you still need firmware you can trust. You can’t trust Qualcomm.
Are you implying that they put the vulnerability there? What is even your point? As far as I know they were the first ones to have a fix for that issue but apparently that means that they’re inherently insecure. Like seriously, do you even have any idea what you’re talking about???
They don’t seem annoyed by their own false positives when they classify anyone who opposes genociding Palestinians as a terrorist. The UK Government seems quite happy with these heavy-handed tactics for the oppression of politically inconvenient people.
who the FUCK is yoti and how do we make them SUFFER for this until they fucking regret it enough to STOP
Ive been paying my domain registrar for services for a decade or so.
A few weeks ago they asked me to confirm my ID with yoti.
Now im in the process of switching to another registrar.
Im so fucking sick of having to invest so much effort just for a bare minimum of privacy.
Perhaps there will be a future generation that saves IPv6 addresses like we do phone numbers.
But then the ISP will ask for Yoti 🤦
based of you to bail on those shitbags, honestly :D
i hope a lot of places lose a ton of business because of Yoti specifically. I hope it hurts and I hope they know why it hurts.
I left PayPal because they asked for a video instead of a proper method of verification.
I’m just old enough to get cranky about silly things that aren’t important to other people I guess.
Which registrar, if you’re willing to disclose?
I’m using multiple, with some domains not having many options. I have yet to see this but it’s worrying.
only domains
Domains was a dot au TLD.
I have dozens, but the request was only applied to one of them. I got the impression they were doing the requests incrementally to give support a chance to field all the tickets from people like myself pushing back.
With the ticket, at first a human responded, then the next response was a few pages of AI slop which didnt answer my enquiry. I politely told them that the AI generated response didnt answer my question and asked them to have a human review and respond.
Then I found a more expensive Australian registrar ventraip. They at least claimed to have 24/7 human support. I transferred the offending domain.
Onlydomains idiots replied a week later saying “uh, it looks like this domain has been transferred away, and that was the only one we had requested ID for at this time, so you dont need to do anything for now i guess.”
Idiots.
I doubt their support team has any control over the situation. It’s honestly surprising you got the final email.
My enquiry was to see whether I could provide business details instead of confirming my identity.
The eligibility criteria is either an Australian resident individual or an Australian company.
They said I could transfer to a company but it costs $200.
I was trying to get them to tell me whether that was their fee or the regulator auda. Support didnt comprehend the question.
Yoti is a British company headquartered in London that operates age verification and digital identity services
deleted by creator
Well that explains a lot. Fucking nanny state.
Don’t the Brits have very strong defamation laws? Seems like an easy lawsuit to win.
I mean… GrapheneOS is here to do exactly the opposite of that. Lol. I mean… Fuck Yoti but like ¯\(ツ)/¯
Btw It would be better to prove that it is secure. If you think about last year, for example (That applies to Qualcomm, so you’d have to check what hardware is installed. ) —CVE-2026-25262(But it’s only now making headlines)—the question remains: what hasn’t been discovered yet?
Oh look, grapheneOS was vulnerable… but it’s been fixed now https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/35355-details-on-the-may-2026-android-security-bulletin (not same CVE)
https://forum.torproject.org/t/enabling-grapheneos-protections-causes-tor-browser-for-android-to-break/21535 lol
The focus is still on what has been discovered; the question remains: what has not yet been discovered? And you still need firmware you can trust. You can’t trust Qualcomm.
Dont forget the whole infrastructure. https://youtu.be/fM5w7bFNvWI
Are you implying that they put the vulnerability there? What is even your point? As far as I know they were the first ones to have a fix for that issue but apparently that means that they’re inherently insecure. Like seriously, do you even have any idea what you’re talking about???
I see what you’re saying. I’m partial to Graphene but I am picking up what you’re putting down.
GrapheneOS: Our Daily Honeypot. You can’t trust any cell phone. The operating system doesn’t matter. 🤣
I’m not opposed to old school devices but realistically they’re impractical in today’s world.
I used to use flip phones. While cheap, too much of the world expects you to have a smartphone.
I figure that the authorities will get annoyed if they keep receiving false positives from this company
They don’t seem annoyed by their own false positives when they classify anyone who opposes genociding Palestinians as a terrorist. The UK Government seems quite happy with these heavy-handed tactics for the oppression of politically inconvenient people.
deleted by creator
Zionist scum.
Israel is responsible for genociding Palestine and Britain is guilty for supporting it with arms sales.
deleted by creator
🤣 stay with the honeypot